On Wed, Dec 19, 2007 at 03:04:51PM -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > Anton Vorontsov wrote: > > >diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c > >index 3cf84d0..91bac51 100644 > >--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c > >+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_soc.c > >@@ -1242,7 +1242,7 @@ int __init fsl_spi_init(struct spi_board_info > >*board_infos, > > } > > > > for (np = NULL, i = 1; > >- (np = of_find_compatible_node(np, "spi", "fsl_spi")) != NULL; > >+ (np = of_find_compatible_node(np, NULL, "fsl,spi")) != NULL; > > Can you keep the original code around to look for older device trees that > are wrong? Backwards compatibility is important. I don't want to have to > update the device tree just because I update the kernel.
I though about it. Is your device tree source out of tree? Otherwise it should be trivial to upgrade the dtb, instead of producing cruft in the kernel. I vote for less legacy code, but lets see what others will say. So far count is 1:1. ;-) Thanks, -- Anton Vorontsov email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] backup email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] irc://irc.freenode.net/bd2 _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
