On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 10:44:23AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote: > find a solution that would work transparently. I mean that adding > an extra hacks into selected functions in the patch might be quite > error prone and problems hard to debug. I think that we all want this > but I wanted to be sure :-)
Full ACK. Again, the TOC restore needs to go _after_ the replacement function, and the klp_return_helper works as transparently as possible, so this was my first choice. Arguments on the stack? I thought we'll deal with them once we get there (e.g. _really_ need to patch a varargs function or one with a silly signature). Torsten _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev