On Thu, 2016-07-04 at 22:00:34 UTC, Hari Bathini wrote:
> __end_handlers marker was intended to mark down upto code that gets
> called from exception prologs. But that hasn't kept pace with code
> changes. Case in point, slb_miss_realmode being called from exception
> prolog code but isn't below __end_handlers marker. So, __end_handlers
> marker is as good as a comment but could be misleading at times if
> it isn't in sync with the code, as is the case now. So, let us avoid
> this confusion by having a better comment and removing __end_handlers
> marker altogether.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hari Bathini <hbath...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Applied to powerpc next, thanks.

https://git.kernel.org/powerpc/c/057b6d7e62ea4e6b1809e29469

cheers
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to