The original code states:
Make sure a LLI block is not created that will span 8K max FIS
boundary. If the block spans such a FIS boundary, there is a chance
that a DMA burst will cross that boundary -- this results in an error
in the host controller.
Since we have switched to generic DMAengine API we satisfy above by setting
dma_boundary value to 0x1fff.
Suggested-by: Mans Rullgard <m...@mansr.com>
Tested-by: Christian Lamparter <chunk...@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevche...@linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c | 8 +++++++-
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
index 7f95389..aee8873 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/sata_dwc_460ex.c
@@ -1151,7 +1151,13 @@ static struct scsi_host_template sata_dwc_sht = {
*/
.sg_tablesize = LIBATA_MAX_PRD,
/* .can_queue = ATA_MAX_QUEUE, */
- .dma_boundary = ATA_DMA_BOUNDARY,
+ /*
+ * Make sure a LLI block is not created that will span 8K max FIS
+ * boundary. If the block spans such a FIS boundary, there is a chance
+ * that a DMA burst will cross that boundary -- this results in an
+ * error in the host controller.
+ */
+ .dma_boundary = 0x1fff /* ATA_DMA_BOUNDARY */,
};
static struct ata_port_operations sata_dwc_ops = {
--
2.8.0.rc3
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
