On 06/15/2016 11:11 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-08-06 at 16:54:27 UTC, "Shreyas B. Prabhu" wrote:
>> pnv_init_idle_states discovers supported idle states from the
>> device tree and does the required initialization. Set power_save
>> function pointer only after this initialization is done
> 
> This looks like a bug fix? Or is this not a concern in practice for some 
> reason
> (and if so what is that reason)?
> 

This isn't a concern currently because, all powernv machines so far
supported nap and nap does not need any initialization from kernel side.

Thanks,
Shreyas

_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to