On Thursday, June 30, 2016 01:47:09 AM Yuantian Tang wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki [mailto:r...@rjwysocki.net] > > Sent: Thursday, June 30, 2016 9:47 AM > > To: Yuantian Tang <yuantian.t...@nxp.com> > > Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net>; Russell King <li...@armlinux.org.uk>; > > Michael Turquette <mturque...@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd > > <sb...@codeaurora.org>; Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>; linux- > > c...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linuxppc- > > d...@lists.ozlabs.org; Yang-Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; Xiaofeng Ren > > <xiaofeng....@nxp.com>; Scott Wood <scottw...@freescale.com> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] clk: Add consumer APIs for discovering possible > > parent clocks > > > > On Wednesday, June 29, 2016 05:50:26 AM Yuantian Tang wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > This patch is acked by clock maintainer. If no comments from anyone else, > > we will merge it in next week. > > > > There is a cpufreq commit depending on it. Are you going to handle that one > > too? > > > That one has been acked by cpufreq maintainer. You can get this from patch > comments.
I know that it has been ACKed. My question is whether or not you are going to apply it along the [1/2]. If not, it will have to be deferred until the [1/2] is merged and then applied which may not be desirable. Thanks, Rafael _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
