On Wed, 06/29 23:38, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:35:54PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote: > > also more code and less flexible IMO. For example, we need at least two > > variants, for attribute_group and device_attribute separately, right? > > Yes, or maybe just a calling convention that just passes both.
OK, I can look into that, but I'm not sure about the error handling. Currently add_disk returns void, do you have any plan on that too? should I change it in v3 (to at least return the attribute creation failure)? Fam _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
