On 07/08/2016 04:57 PM, Nathan Fontenot wrote:
> On 07/08/2016 06:19 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
>> PowerVM seems to only ever provide a single hotplug slot per PHB.
>> The under lying slot hotplug registration code assumed multiple slots,
>> but the actual implementation is broken for multiple slots. This went
>> unnoticed for years due to the nature of PowerVM as mentioned
>> previously. Under qemu/kvm the hotplug slot model aligns more with
>> x86 where multiple slots are presented under a single PHB. As seen
>> in the following each additional slot after the first fails to
>> register due to each slot always being compared against the first
>> child node of the PHB in the device tree.
>>
>> [ 6.492291] rpaphp: RPA HOT Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.1
>> [ 6.492569] rpaphp: Slot [Slot 0] registered
>> [ 6.492577] rpaphp: pci_hp_register failed with error -16
>> [ 6.493082] rpaphp: pci_hp_register failed with error -16
>> [ 6.493138] rpaphp: pci_hp_register failed with error -16
>> [ 6.493161] rpaphp: pci_hp_register failed with error -16
>>
>> The registration logic is fixed so that each slot is compared
>> against the existing child devices of the PHB in the device tree to
>> determine present slots vs empty slots.
>>
>> [ 38.481750] rpaphp: RPA HOT Plug PCI Controller Driver version: 0.1
>> [ 38.482004] rpaphp: Slot [C0] registered
>> [ 38.482127] rpaphp: Slot [C1] registered
>> [ 38.482241] rpaphp: Slot [C2] registered
>> [ 38.482356] rpaphp: Slot [C3] registered
>> [ 38.482495] rpaphp: Slot [C4] registered
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_slot.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_slot.c
>> b/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_slot.c
>> index 6937c72..c90fa8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_slot.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/hotplug/rpaphp_slot.c
>> @@ -117,8 +117,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rpaphp_deregister_slot);
>> int rpaphp_register_slot(struct slot *slot)
>> {
>> struct hotplug_slot *php_slot = slot->hotplug_slot;
>> + struct device_node *child;
>> + u32 my_index;
>> int retval;
>> - int slotno;
>> + int slotno = -1;
>>
>> dbg("%s registering slot:path[%s] index[%x], name[%s] pdomain[%x]
>> type[%d]\n",
>> __func__, slot->dn->full_name, slot->index, slot->name,
>> @@ -130,10 +132,15 @@ int rpaphp_register_slot(struct slot *slot)
>> return -EAGAIN;
>> }
>>
>> - if (slot->dn->child)
>> - slotno = PCI_SLOT(PCI_DN(slot->dn->child)->devfn);
>> - else
>> - slotno = -1;
>> + for_each_child_of_node(slot->dn, child) {
>> + retval = of_property_read_u32(child, "my,ibm-drc-index",
>> &my_index);
>
> Shouldn't this be reading ibm,my-drc-index? instead of my,ibm-drc-index.
Doh, indeed it should.
-Tyrel
>
> -Nathan
>
>> + if (my_index == slot->index) {
>> + slotno = PCI_SLOT(PCI_DN(child)->devfn);
>> + of_node_put(child);
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> retval = pci_hp_register(php_slot, slot->bus, slotno, slot->name);
>> if (retval) {
>> err("pci_hp_register failed with error %d\n", retval);
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
