kvmppc_h_put_tce_indirect labels a u64 pointer as __user. It also
labelled the u64 where get_user puts the result as __user. This isn't
a pointer and so doesn't need to be labelled __user.
Split the u64 value definition onto a new line to make it clear that
it doesn't get the annotation.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Axtens <d...@axtens.net>
---
arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
index 18cf6d1f8174..c379ff5a4438 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kvm/book3s_64_vio.c
@@ -242,7 +242,8 @@ long kvmppc_h_put_tce_indirect(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
struct kvmppc_spapr_tce_table *stt;
long i, ret = H_SUCCESS, idx;
unsigned long entry, ua = 0;
- u64 __user *tces, tce;
+ u64 __user *tces;
+ u64 tce;
stt = kvmppc_find_table(vcpu, liobn);
if (!stt)
--
2.1.4
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
