On Tuesday 26 July 2016 10:57 AM, Nicholas Piggin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2016 20:22:14 +0530
Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
Two #defs LAZY_INTERRUPT_ENABLED and
LAZY_INTERRUPT_DISABLED are added to be used
when updating paca->soft_enabled.
This is a very nice patchset, but can this not be a new name?
Thanks, but idea is from ben :)
Regarding the name, I looked at the initial patchset posted by
paul and took the name from it :).
But will work on that, any suggestion for the name?
Maddy
We use "soft enabled/disabled" everywhere for it. I think lazy
is an implementation detail anyway because some interrupts don't
cause a hard disable at all.
Thanks,
Nick
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
