Hi Gavin,
You don't need my ack for any of these, and I assume you'll merge them
through the powerpc tree.
Minor comments below, feel free to ignore them.
On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 10:15:30PM +1000, Gavin Shan wrote:
> ...
> @@ -536,9 +565,16 @@ static struct pnv_php_slot *pnv_php_alloc_slot(struct
> device_node *dn)
> if (unlikely(!php_slot))
> return NULL;
>
> + php_slot->event = kzalloc(sizeof(struct pnv_php_event), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (unlikely(!php_slot->event)) {
> + kfree(php_slot);
> + return NULL;
> + }
Since you *always* allocate the event when allocating the php_slot,
making the event a member of php_slot (instead of keeping a pointer to
it) would simplify your memory management a bit.
It seems to be the style in this file to use "unlikely" liberally, but
I really doubt there's any performance consideration in this code. To
me it adds more clutter than usefulness.
> +static irqreturn_t pnv_php_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> +{
> + struct pnv_php_slot *php_slot = data;
> + struct pci_dev *pchild, *pdev = php_slot->pdev;
> + struct eeh_dev *edev;
> + struct eeh_pe *pe;
> + struct pnv_php_event *event;
> + u16 sts, lsts;
> + u8 presence;
> + bool added;
> + unsigned long flags;
> + int ret;
> +
> + pcie_capability_read_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, &sts);
> + sts &= (PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_PDC | PCI_EXP_SLTSTA_DLLSC);
> + pcie_capability_write_word(pdev, PCI_EXP_SLTSTA, sts);
I didn't realize that this is some sort of hybrid of native PCIe
hotplug and PowerNV-specific stuff. Wonder if there's any opportunity
to combine with or leverage pciehp. That seems pretty blue-sky
though, since there's so much PowerNV special sauce here.
Bjorn
