Hi Michael, > > 14c00-14c00 g exc_virt_0x4c00_system_call > ^ > What's this? The address? If so it's wrong?
Offset into the binary I think, there's one 64kB page of ELF gunk at the start. > Seems likely. But I can't see why. > > AFAICS we have never emitted a size for those symbols: > > Old: > $ nm --print-size build/vmlinux | grep -w system_call_relon_pSeries > c000000000004c00 T system_call_relon_pSeries > > New: > $ nm --print-size build/vmlinux | grep -w exc_virt_0x4c00_system_call > c000000000004c00 T exc_virt_0x4c00_system_call > > > It also doesn't look like we're emitting another symbol with the same > address, which has caused confusion in the past: > > Old: > c000000000004c00 T exc_virt_0x4c00_system_call > c000000000004d00 T exc_virt_0x4d00_single_step > > New: > c000000000004c00 T system_call_relon_pSeries > c000000000004d00 T single_step_relon_pSeries > > So more digging required. Thanks for checking, it's starting to sound like a perf bug. Anton
