2016-10-24 16:42+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 21/10/2016 20:39, rkrc...@redhat.com wrote:
>> 2016-10-21 11:27+0000, David Laight:
>>> From: Pan Xinhui
>>>> Sent: 20 October 2016 22:28
>>>> Commit ("x86, kvm: support vcpu preempted check") add one field "__u8
>>>> preempted" into struct kvm_steal_time. This field tells if one vcpu is
>>>> running or not.
>>>>
>>>> It is zero if 1) some old KVM deos not support this filed. 2) the vcpu is
>>>> preempted. Other values means the vcpu has been preempted.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt | 8 +++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>>>> b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>>>> index 2a71c8f..3376f13 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/msr.txt
>>>> @@ -208,7 +208,8 @@ MSR_KVM_STEAL_TIME: 0x4b564d03
>>>> __u64 steal;
>>>> __u32 version;
>>>> __u32 flags;
>>>> - __u32 pad[12];
>>>> + __u8 preempted;
>>>> + __u32 pad[11];
>>>> }
>>>
>>> I think I'd be explicit about the 3 pad bytes you've left.
>>
>> Seconded.
>>
>> With that change are all KVM bits
>>
>> Acked-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrc...@redhat.com>
>
> Saw this after replying to the previous message. If you need to post v6
> of the full series, it would be nice if you removed the
> kvm_read_guest_cached. But anyway it wasn't my intention to override Radim.
The patch was acceptable to me even now, so I definitely wouldn't mind
if it were even nicer. :)
