On 01/26/2017 12:28 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Jan 2017 15:02:19 -0600
> Thomas Falcon <tlfal...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>>  static irqreturn_t ibmvnic_interrupt(int irq, void *instance)
>>  {
>>      struct ibmvnic_adapter *adapter = instance;
>> +    unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> +    spin_lock_irqsave(&adapter->crq.lock, flags);
>> +    vio_disable_interrupts(adapter->vdev);
>> +    tasklet_schedule(&adapter->tasklet);
>> +    spin_unlock_irqrestore(&adapter->crq.lock, flags);
>> +    return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
> Why not use NAPI? rather than a tasklet
>
This interrupt function doesn't process packets, but message passing between 
firmware and driver for determining device capabilities and available 
resources, such as the number TX and RX queues. 

Reply via email to