On 04/10/2017 07:34 AM, Rashmica Gupta wrote: > Current behaviour assumes that memory in RAM is contiguous and > iterates from the start of RAM to (start + size of memory). When the > memory isn't physically contiguous, this approach doesn't work.
In dis contiguous platform, we just finish up walking linear mapping prematurely before the end of the RAM ? > > If memory exists at 0-5 GB and 6-10 GB then the current approach will > check if entries exist in the hash table from 0GB to 9GB. This patch > changes the behaviour to iterate up to the end of RAM. So it fixes the commit which added memblock_phys_mem_size(). Hence needs "Fixes: " tag as well.
