On Mon, 2017-08-28 at 19:37 +0200, Frederic Barrat wrote: > Good point, I had missed the change. It looks like I now need to call > radix__flush_all_mm(), which I would have to export outside of > tlb-radix.c first. > > Any problem with having a flush_all_mm() to complement a flush_tlb_mm()? > It's tainted with radix, and the 2 would be equivalent on hash, but it > would make things easy.
Yup something like that. Cheers, Ben.
