Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@au1.ibm.com> writes: > On Mon, 2017-08-14 at 22:49 +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: >> > - /* >> > - * We limit the allocation that depend on ppc64_rma_size >> > - * to first_memblock_size. We also clamp it to 1GB to >> > - * avoid some funky things such as RTAS bugs. >> >> That comment about RTAS is 7 years old, and I'm pretty sure it was a >> historical note when it was written. >> >> I'm inclined to drop it and if we discover new bugs with RTAS on Power9 >> then we can always put it back. > > Arent' we using a 32-bit RTAS ? (Afaik there's a 64-bit one, we just > never used it ..). In this case we need to at least clamp to 2G (no > trust RTAS doing unsigned properly). >
Yes. I added the limit to radix after I observed that we have MSR[SF] = 0. IIRC it was PACA access that was causing it to crash on return from RTAS. hmm the commit also explains that. powerpc/mm/radix: Limit paca allocation in radix On return from RTAS we access the paca variables and we have 64 bit disabled. This requires us to limit paca in 32 bit range. Fix this by setting ppc64_rma_size to first_memblock_size/1G range. -aneesh
