Hi! Find below my first regression report for Linux 4.14. It lists 4 regressions I'm currently aware of (two of the reports are my own). I skimmed LKML, bugzilla.kernel.org, but those were all I found that looked worthy. And nobody pointed me to any regressions directly. Sigh. Either we are doing really well this cycle or nobody wants his regression tracked...
As always: Are you aware of any other regressions? Then please let me know by mail (a simple bounce in my direction is enough!). For details see http://bit.ly/lnxregtrackid And please tell me if there is anything in the report that shouldn't be there. Ciao, Thorsten == Current regressions == Module removal-related regression Status: Fix "driver core: suppress sending MODALIAS in UNBIND uevents" is sitting in greg's driver-core-linus Reported: 2017-09-09 https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150497889508778 Cause: 1455cf8dbfd06aa7651dcfccbadb7a093944ca65 stalls, short lived or long lived lockups very shortly after boot. Status: Nothing new since 10+ days; maybe fixed already? poked list for a status update Reported: 2017-09-19 https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150583434416295 Cause: 74def747bcd0 CIFS SMB2+ combined with pythons xattr.listxattr leads to "IOError: [Errno 61]" Status: no reaction from developers yet; need to poke list again Note: Disclaimer: A regression the regression tracker reported Reported: 2017-09-26 https://marc.info/?l=linux-cifs&m=150644485708526 Cause: 8dc5b3a6cb2f (assumed) Ath10k disconnects Status: brand new, might turn out to be a false alarm Note: Disclaimer: A regression the regression tracker reported Reported: 2017-10-01 http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2017-October/010189.html == Reported, but not added to the report for one reason or another == New default s2idle does not work on Dell XPS 13 9360 Status: Might be fixed, asked for a status update. https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196907 dd1c1f2f20: will-it-scale.per_process_ops -5% regression Status: Linus: "Sadly, while I love the concept of performance tracking, the "will-it-scale" reports haven't really been reliable enough to really be useful." https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/9/3/103 https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150457748221543 52306e882f: stress-ng.lockofd.ops_per_sec -11% regression Status: see above https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150658588810343 9e52fc2b50: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -16% regression Status: see above; but there was some discussion about this here, so maybe it should be on the list https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=150649209519462
