On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 07:41:07PM -0500, Sean MacLennan wrote: > David Gibson wrote: > > Err.. now I'm doubly confused. Initially I thought you'd need to > > change the size part of reg somewhere, but your description above just > > convinced me you didn't (because you were essentially just shifting a > > 4M map up into the high rather than low 4M of the 64M space). Now > > you're saying you do.. > > > If you tell the mtd driver that the flash is 64M, when it is really 4M, > it goes oops. So you do have to get the size right in the reg field.
Ah! The top-level reg field, not the partitions. Now I understand. Except, since the 4M layout is the expected future norm, I would have thought that's what you'd encode into the dts, and mangle it into the 64M version, rather than the other way around. -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev