Joe Perches <j...@perches.com> writes: > On Thu, 2018-03-15 at 14:57 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 14, 2018 at 06:22:07PM -0300, Thiago Jung Bauermann wrote: >> > SF Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> writes: >> > > From: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> >> > > Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2018 09:03:42 +0100 >> > > >> > > Add a jump target so that a bit of exception handling can be better >> > > reused >> > > at the end of this function. >> > > >> > > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software. >> > > >> > > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfr...@users.sourceforge.net> >> > > --- >> > > arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_file_64.c | 28 >> > > ++++++++++++---------------- >> > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) >> > >> > I liked it. Thanks! >> > >> > Reviewed-by: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauer...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> >> >> You know that compilers already re-use string constants so this doesn't >> actually save memory? > > And modern compilers create their own jump labels > so this doesn't change object code either?
I must have missed the memo about us only changing source code if it results in better object code. cheers
