Le 23/03/2018 à 03:14, Benjamin Herrenschmidt a écrit :
On Thu, 2018-03-22 at 17:37 +0100, Christophe Lombard wrote:
The cxl driver cannot disable the interrupt at the device level and has
to use disable_irq[_nosync] instead.
To avoid the implementation of the lazy optimisation (the interrupt is
marked disabled, but the hardware is left unmasked), we can disable it,
for a particular irq line, by calling
'irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY)'.

Why do you need that ? What's wrong with the lazy approach ? It makes
disable_irq/enable_irq faster...

You shouldn't need that unless your device is generating a *LOT* of
irqs while disabled.


An issue on POWERVM (CAPI) has been introduced with the following patch
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=bf22ff45bed664aefb5c4e43029057a199b7070c The PSL or AFU interrupts are never received by the cxl driver because the interrupts are never unmasked.

Without this patch (genirq: Avoid unnecessary low level irq function calls), the callback desc->irq_data.chip->irq_unmask(&desc->irq_data); (= ics_rtas_unmask_irq()) is called by default through irq_enable().

The cxl driver disables the interrupts before attaching the process element and enables the interrupts after that.

In the current code, irq_enable() unmasks the irq only if the irq state is IRQD_IRQ_MASKED but it does not.

Call irq_set_status_flags(irq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY) allows forcing irq_disable() to update the irq state to IRQD_IRQ_MASKED and by default
irq_enable() will unmask the irq through ics_rtas_unmask_irq().




Signed-off-by: Christophe Lombard <clomb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c
index f58b4b6c..dc476e1 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/guest.c
@@ -389,6 +389,7 @@ static void disable_afu_irqs(struct cxl_context *ctx)
                hwirq = ctx->irqs.offset[r];
                for (i = 0; i < ctx->irqs.range[r]; hwirq++, i++) {
                        virq = irq_find_mapping(NULL, hwirq);
+                       irq_set_status_flags(virq, IRQ_DISABLE_UNLAZY);
                        disable_irq(virq);
                }
        }

Reply via email to