After more experience with the cases where no one the si_code of 0 is
used both as a signal specific si_code, and as SI_USER it appears that
no one cares about the signal specific si_code case and the good
solution is to just fix the architectures by using a different si_code.

In none of the conversations has anyone even suggested that anything
depends on the signal specific redefinition of SI_USER.

There are at least test cases that care when si_code as 0 does not work
as si_user.

So make things simple and keep the generic code from introducing
problems by removing the special casing of TRAP_FIXME and FPE_FIXME.
This will ensure the generic case of sending a signal with kill will
always set SI_USER and work.

The architecture specific, and signal specific overloads that set
si_code to 0 will now have problems with signalfd and the 32bit compat
versions of siginfo copying.  At least until they are fixed.

Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <>
 kernel/signal.c | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index d56f4d496c89..fc82d2c0918f 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -2835,15 +2835,6 @@ enum siginfo_layout siginfo_layout(int sig, int si_code)
                        layout = SIL_POLL;
                else if (si_code < 0)
                        layout = SIL_RT;
-               /* Tests to support buggy kernel ABIs */
-#ifdef TRAP_FIXME
-               if ((sig == SIGTRAP) && (si_code == TRAP_FIXME))
-                       layout = SIL_FAULT;
-#ifdef FPE_FIXME
-               if ((sig == SIGFPE) && (si_code == FPE_FIXME))
-                       layout = SIL_FAULT;
        return layout;

Reply via email to