On 23/04/2018 08:42, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 04:33:14PM +0200, Laurent Dufour wrote:
>> From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
>>
>> Wrap the VMA modifications (vma_adjust/unmap_page_range) with sequence
>> counts such that we can easily test if a VMA is changed.
> 
> So, seqcount is to protect modifying all attributes of vma?

The seqcount is used to protect fields that will be used during the speculative
page fault like boundaries, protections.

>>
>> The unmap_page_range() one allows us to make assumptions about
>> page-tables; when we find the seqcount hasn't changed we can assume
>> page-tables are still valid.
> 
> Hmm, seqcount covers page-table, too.
> Please describe what the seqcount want to protect.

The calls to vm_write_begin/end() in unmap_page_range() are used to detect when
a VMA is being unmap and thus that new page fault should not be satisfied for
this VMA. This is protecting the VMA unmapping operation, not the page tables
themselves.

>>
>> The flip side is that we cannot distinguish between a vma_adjust() and
>> the unmap_page_range() -- where with the former we could have
>> re-checked the vma bounds against the address.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
>>
>> [Port to 4.12 kernel]
>> [Build depends on CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT]
>> [Introduce vm_write_* inline function depending on
>>  CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT]
>> [Fix lock dependency between mapping->i_mmap_rwsem and vma->vm_sequence by
>>  using vm_raw_write* functions]
>> [Fix a lock dependency warning in mmap_region() when entering the error
>>  path]
>> [move sequence initialisation INIT_VMA()]
>> Signed-off-by: Laurent Dufour <lduf...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>  include/linux/mm.h       | 44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  include/linux/mm_types.h |  3 +++
>>  mm/memory.c              |  2 ++
>>  mm/mmap.c                | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 80 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
>> index efc1248b82bd..988daf7030c9 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
>> @@ -1264,6 +1264,9 @@ struct zap_details {
>>  static inline void INIT_VMA(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>>  {
>>      INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->anon_vma_chain);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
>> +    seqcount_init(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +#endif
>>  }
>>  
>>  struct page *_vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
>> @@ -1386,6 +1389,47 @@ static inline void unmap_shared_mapping_range(struct 
>> address_space *mapping,
>>      unmap_mapping_range(mapping, holebegin, holelen, 0);
>>  }
>>  
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
>> +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +    write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> +                                     int subclass)
>> +{
>> +    write_seqcount_begin_nested(&vma->vm_sequence, subclass);
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +    write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +    raw_write_seqcount_begin(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +    raw_write_seqcount_end(&vma->vm_sequence);
>> +}
>> +#else
>> +static inline void vm_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_write_begin_nested(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
>> +                                     int subclass)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_raw_write_begin(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +static inline void vm_raw_write_end(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +#endif /* CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT */
>> +
>>  extern int access_process_vm(struct task_struct *tsk, unsigned long addr,
>>              void *buf, int len, unsigned int gup_flags);
>>  extern int access_remote_vm(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long addr,
>> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
>> index 21612347d311..db5e9d630e7a 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
>> @@ -335,6 +335,9 @@ struct vm_area_struct {
>>      struct mempolicy *vm_policy;    /* NUMA policy for the VMA */
>>  #endif
>>      struct vm_userfaultfd_ctx vm_userfaultfd_ctx;
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SPECULATIVE_PAGE_FAULT
>> +    seqcount_t vm_sequence;
>> +#endif
>>  } __randomize_layout;
>>  
>>  struct core_thread {
>> diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
>> index f86efcb8e268..f7fed053df80 100644
>> --- a/mm/memory.c
>> +++ b/mm/memory.c
>> @@ -1503,6 +1503,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>>      unsigned long next;
>>  
>>      BUG_ON(addr >= end);
> 
> The comment about saying it aims for page-table stability will help.

A comment may be added mentioning that we use the seqcount to indicate that the
VMA is modified, being unmapped. But there is not a real page table protection,
and I think this may be confusing to talk about page table stability here.

> 
>> +    vm_write_begin(vma);
>>      tlb_start_vma(tlb, vma);
>>      pgd = pgd_offset(vma->vm_mm, addr);
>>      do {
>> @@ -1512,6 +1513,7 @@ void unmap_page_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
>>              next = zap_p4d_range(tlb, vma, pgd, addr, next, details);
>>      } while (pgd++, addr = next, addr != end);
>>      tlb_end_vma(tlb, vma);
>> +    vm_write_end(vma);
>>  }
>>  
>>  
>> diff --git a/mm/mmap.c b/mm/mmap.c
>> index 8bd9ae1dfacc..813e49589ea1 100644
>> --- a/mm/mmap.c
>> +++ b/mm/mmap.c
>> @@ -692,6 +692,30 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned 
>> long start,
>>      long adjust_next = 0;
>>      int remove_next = 0;
>>  
>> +    /*
>> +     * Why using vm_raw_write*() functions here to avoid lockdep's warning ?
>> +     *
>> +     * Locked is complaining about a theoretical lock dependency, involving
>> +     * 3 locks:
>> +     *   mapping->i_mmap_rwsem --> vma->vm_sequence --> fs_reclaim
>> +     *
>> +     * Here are the major path leading to this dependency :
>> +     *  1. __vma_adjust() mmap_sem  -> vm_sequence -> i_mmap_rwsem
>> +     *  2. move_vmap() mmap_sem -> vm_sequence -> fs_reclaim
>> +     *  3. __alloc_pages_nodemask() fs_reclaim -> i_mmap_rwsem
>> +     *  4. unmap_mapping_range() i_mmap_rwsem -> vm_sequence
>> +     *
>> +     * So there is no way to solve this easily, especially because in
>> +     * unmap_mapping_range() the i_mmap_rwsem is grab while the impacted
>> +     * VMAs are not yet known.
>> +     * However, the way the vm_seq is used is guarantying that we will
>> +     * never block on it since we just check for its value and never wait
>> +     * for it to move, see vma_has_changed() and handle_speculative_fault().
>> +     */
>> +    vm_raw_write_begin(vma);
>> +    if (next)
>> +            vm_raw_write_begin(next);
>> +
>>      if (next && !insert) {
>>              struct vm_area_struct *exporter = NULL, *importer = NULL;
>>  
>> @@ -902,6 +926,7 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned 
>> long start,
>>                      anon_vma_merge(vma, next);
>>              mm->map_count--;
>>              mpol_put(vma_policy(next));
>> +            vm_raw_write_end(next);
>>              kmem_cache_free(vm_area_cachep, next);
>>              /*
>>               * In mprotect's case 6 (see comments on vma_merge),
>> @@ -916,6 +941,8 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned 
>> long start,
>>                       * "vma->vm_next" gap must be updated.
>>                       */
>>                      next = vma->vm_next;
>> +                    if (next)
>> +                            vm_raw_write_begin(next);
>>              } else {
>>                      /*
>>                       * For the scope of the comment "next" and
>> @@ -962,6 +989,10 @@ int __vma_adjust(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned 
>> long start,
>>      if (insert && file)
>>              uprobe_mmap(insert);
>>  
>> +    if (next && next != vma)
>> +            vm_raw_write_end(next);
>> +    vm_raw_write_end(vma);
>> +
>>      validate_mm(mm);
>>  
>>      return 0;
>> -- 
>> 2.7.4
>>
> 

Reply via email to