-----Original Message----- From: Leo Li Sent: 2018年5月12日 1:00 To: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo....@nxp.com>; Yinbo Zhu <yinbo....@nxp.com>; Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>; Catalin Marinas ) <catalin.mari...@arm.com>; Will Deacon ) <will.dea...@arm.com>; Lorenzo Pieralisi ) <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com> Cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo....@nxp.com>; Ran Wang <ran.wan...@nxp.com>; Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>; Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>; Shawn Guo <shawn...@kernel.org>; Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bu...@nxp.com>; Z.q. Hou <zhiqiang....@nxp.com>; Jerry Huang <jerry.hu...@nxp.com>; M.h. Lian <minghuan.l...@nxp.com>; Qiang Zhao <qiang.z...@nxp.com>; Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>; Jiaheng Fan <jiaheng....@nxp.com>; Po Liu <po....@nxp.com>; Nipun Gupta <nipun.gu...@nxp.com>; Horia Geantă <horia.gea...@nxp.com>; Priyanka Jain <priyanka.j...@nxp.com>; Sumit Garg <sumit.g...@nxp.com>; costi <constantin.tu...@freescale.com>; Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcare...@nxp.com>; open list:CLOCKSOURCE, CLOCKEVENT DRIVERS <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>; open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS <devicet...@vger.kernel.org>; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; open list:FREESCALE SOC DRIVERS <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Andy Tang <andy.t...@nxp.com>; Ying Zhang <ying.zhang22...@nxp.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/9] soc: fsl: set rcpm bit for FTM
> -----Original Message----- > From: Yinbo Zhu [mailto:yinbo....@nxp.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 10:35 PM > To: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo....@nxp.com>; Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org>; > Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com>; Catalin Marinas ) > <catalin.mari...@arm.com>; Will Deacon ) <will.dea...@arm.com>; > Lorenzo Pieralisi ) <lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com>; Leo Li > <leoyang...@nxp.com> > Cc: Xiaobo Xie <xiaobo....@nxp.com>; Ran Wang <ran.wan...@nxp.com>; > Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezc...@linaro.org>; Thomas Gleixner > <t...@linutronix.de>; Shawn Guo <shawn...@kernel.org>; > Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bu...@nxp.com>; Z.q. Hou > <zhiqiang....@nxp.com>; Jerry Huang <jerry.hu...@nxp.com>; M.h. Lian > <minghuan.l...@nxp.com>; Qiang Zhao <qiang.z...@nxp.com>; Fabio > Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com>; Jiaheng Fan <jiaheng....@nxp.com>; Po > Liu <po....@nxp.com>; Nipun Gupta <nipun.gu...@nxp.com>; Horia Geantă > <horia.gea...@nxp.com>; Priyanka Jain <priyanka.j...@nxp.com>; Sumit > Garg <sumit.g...@nxp.com>; costi <constantin.tu...@freescale.com>; > Bogdan Purcareata <bogdan.purcare...@nxp.com>; Meng Yi > <meng...@nxp.com>; Wang Dongsheng <dongsheng.w...@nxp.com>; open > list:CLOCKSOURCE, CLOCKEVENT DRIVERS <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org>; > open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS > <devicet...@vger.kernel.org>; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; > open list:FREESCALE SOC DRIVERS <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; Andy > Tang <andy.t...@nxp.com>; Ying Zhang <ying.zhang22...@nxp.com> > Subject: [PATCH 3/9] soc: fsl: set rcpm bit for FTM > > From: Zhang Ying-22455 <ying.zhang22...@nxp.com> > > Set RCPM for FTM when using FTM as wakeup source. Because the RCPM > module of each platform has different big-end and little-end mode, > there need to set RCPM depending on the platform. > > Signed-off-by: Zhang Ying-22455 <ying.zhang22...@nxp.com> > Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo....@nxp.com> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/timer/fsl,ftm-timer.txt | 7 ++ > drivers/soc/fsl/layerscape/ftm_alarm.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++- > 2 files changed, 94 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/fsl,ftm-timer.txt > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/fsl,ftm-timer.txt > index aa8c402..15ead58 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/fsl,ftm-timer.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/timer/fsl,ftm-timer.txt > @@ -3,6 +3,13 @@ Freescale FlexTimer Module (FTM) Timer Required > properties: > > - compatible : should be "fsl,ftm-timer" >Hi Yingbo, >This is a change that breaks backward compatibility and not acceptable. Hi leo, This patch if I keep the change as inner patch and push it to dash-linnux but I will not push it to upstream, It's okay? As far as I know, there was a other patch and file for replace the file and that the patch is already on the upstream https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9391293/ > + Possible compatibles for ARM: > + "fsl,ls1012a-ftm" > + "fsl,ls1021a-ftm" > + "fsl,ls1043a-ftm" > + "fsl,ls1046a-ftm" > + "fsl,ls1088a-ftm" > + "fsl,ls208xa-ftm" > - reg : Specifies base physical address and size of the register sets for the > clock event device and clock source device. > - interrupts : Should be the clock event device interrupt. > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/layerscape/ftm_alarm.c > b/drivers/soc/fsl/layerscape/ftm_alarm.c > index 6f9882f..811dcfa 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/layerscape/ftm_alarm.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/layerscape/ftm_alarm.c >There is no such file in the mainline kernel. So it looks like the patch set >is > based on some internal git repo instead of the upstream Linux kernel. This > kind of patches > shouldn't be sent to the upstream mailing list for review. >Regards, >Leo This patch will not to upstream. Regards, Yinbo.
