expected_pkey_fault() is comparing the contents of pkey
register with 0. This may not be true all the time. There
could be bits set by default by the architecture
which can never be changed. Hence compare the value against
shadow pkey register, which is supposed to track the bits
accurately all throughout
cc: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@intel.com>
cc: Florian Weimer <fwei...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ram Pai <linux...@us.ibm.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c | 4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
index 9afe894..adcae4a 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/vm/protection_keys.c
@@ -916,10 +916,10 @@ void expected_pkey_fault(int pkey)
pkey_assert(last_si_pkey == pkey);
/*
- * The signal handler shold have cleared out PKEY register to let the
+ * The signal handler should have cleared out pkey-register to let the
* test program continue. We now have to restore it.
*/
- if (__read_pkey_reg() != 0)
+ if (__read_pkey_reg() != shadow_pkey_reg)
pkey_assert(0);
__write_pkey_reg(shadow_pkey_reg);
--
1.7.1
