Le 28/08/2018 à 13:09, David Gounaris a écrit :
There is a need to allow higher indexes to be
able to support MPC83xx platforms. (UCC1-UCC5)

As far as I can see, MPC8358 has 8 UCCs (ref https://www.nxp.com/products/processors-and-microcontrollers/power-architecture-processors/powerquicc-processors/powerquicc-ii-pro/powerquicc-ii-pro-processor-with-ddr2-tdm-pci-security-usb-quicc-engine-with-1-gb-ethernet-utopia:MPC8358E)

Christophe


Signed-off-by: David Gounaris <david.gouna...@infinera.com>
---
  drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c b/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
index 5f0366a125e2..3c0e0a1d19ba 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wan/fsl_ucc_hdlc.c
@@ -1015,7 +1015,7 @@ static int ucc_hdlc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
        }
ucc_num = val - 1;
-       if ((ucc_num > 3) || (ucc_num < 0)) {
+       if ((ucc_num > 4) || (ucc_num < 0)) {
                dev_err(&pdev->dev, ": Invalid UCC num\n");
                return -EINVAL;
        }

Reply via email to