On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 7:25 PM Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se> wrote: > > On 2018-08-29 20:42, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 1:03 PM Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se> wrote: > >> > >> On 2018-08-28 03:52, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> In preparation to remove the node name pointer from struct device_node, > >>> convert printf users to use the %pOFn format specifier. > >>> > >>> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org> > >>> Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org> > >>> Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> > >>> Cc: Peter Rosin <p...@axentia.se> > >>> Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > >>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > >>> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <r...@kernel.org> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c | 15 ++++++++------- > >>> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpmux.c | 4 ++-- > >>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c > >>> b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c > >>> index f2a2067525ef..b706fd136ca5 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c > >>> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-powermac.c > >>> @@ -390,7 +390,6 @@ static int i2c_powermac_probe(struct platform_device > >>> *dev) > >>> struct pmac_i2c_bus *bus = dev_get_platdata(&dev->dev); > >>> struct device_node *parent = NULL; > >> > >> Lose the initializer... > > > > That's pretty much unrelated though. > > I disagree. If you remove the need for the initializer, it's very much > related to also remove the initializer.
You're right. I'd stared at it a bit and missed that in fact parent is only accessed within the case statement. Rob
