> On Oct 25, 2018, at 5:35 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:00 AM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> >> wrote: >> You could bite the bullet and add seccomp eBPF support :) > > I'm not convinced this is a good enough reason for gaining the eBPF > attack surface yet. > > Is it an interesting attack surface? It’s certainly scarier if you’re worried about attacks from the sandbox creator, but the security inside the sandbox should be more or less equivalent, no?
- Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add pkru into seccomp_data Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add pkru into seccomp_data Michael Sammler
- Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add pkru into seccomp_data Florian Weimer
- Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add pkru into seccomp_da... Michael Sammler
- Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add pkru into seccom... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add pkru into s... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add pkru in... Andy Lutomirski
- Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add pkr... Kees Cook
- Re: [PATCH] seccomp: Add pkru into seccomp_da... Ram Pai