> On Oct 25, 2018, at 5:35 PM, Kees Cook <keesc...@chromium.org> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Oct 26, 2018 at 12:00 AM, Andy Lutomirski <l...@amacapital.net> 
>> wrote:
>> You could bite the bullet and add seccomp eBPF support :)
> 
> I'm not convinced this is a good enough reason for gaining the eBPF
> attack surface yet.
> 
> 

Is it an interesting attack surface?  It’s certainly scarier if you’re worried 
about attacks from the sandbox creator, but the security inside the sandbox 
should be more or less equivalent, no?

Reply via email to