On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Paul Gortmaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In message: Re: powerpc: cuImage.* creation error > > > on 17/03/2008 Grant Likely wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 2:07 PM, Paul Gortmaker > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In message: powerpc: cuImage.* creation error > > > > > > @@ -253,8 +253,8 @@ image-$(CONFIG_TQM8540) += > cuImage.tqm8540 > > > image-$(CONFIG_TQM8541) += cuImage.tqm8541 > > > image-$(CONFIG_TQM8555) += cuImage.tqm8555 > > > image-$(CONFIG_TQM8560) += cuImage.tqm8560 > > > -image-$(CONFIG_SBC8548) += cuImage.tqm8548 > > > -image-$(CONFIG_SBC8560) += cuImage.tqm8560 > > > +image-$(CONFIG_SBC8548) += cuImage.sbc8548 > > > +image-$(CONFIG_SBC8560) += cuImage.sbc8560 > > > > No, the suffix in the cuImage targets has a 1:1 relationship with dts > > files in arch/powerpc/boot/dts/. If a file doesn't exist there, then > > the target cannot be built. > > You should have both the sbc8548.dts and the sbc8560.dts in your tree. > They have been in there for several weeks now.
Heh; oops. I looked but somehow missed them. I guess I didn't look hard enough. Yes, this looks like the right solution. > Author: Paul Gortmaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Mon Mar 17 18:33:52 2008 -0400 > > wrapper: Add entries for tqm8540 and sbc85xx > > The wrapper script didn't have entries for the TQM8540 board and the > SBC8548 or SBC8560 boards. I've assumed that the TQM8540 console is > 8250 based and not CPM based by looking at its defconfig. There was > also a trailing * on the TQM8555 entry that I removed too. > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Acked-by: Grant Likely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
