Modify __down_read_trylock() to optimize for an unlocked rwsem and make
it generate slightly better code.

Before this patch, down_read_trylock:

   0x0000000000000000 <+0>:     callq  0x5 <down_read_trylock+5>
   0x0000000000000005 <+5>:     jmp    0x18 <down_read_trylock+24>
   0x0000000000000007 <+7>:     lea    0x1(%rdx),%rcx
   0x000000000000000b <+11>:    mov    %rdx,%rax
   0x000000000000000e <+14>:    lock cmpxchg %rcx,(%rdi)
   0x0000000000000013 <+19>:    cmp    %rax,%rdx
   0x0000000000000016 <+22>:    je     0x23 <down_read_trylock+35>
   0x0000000000000018 <+24>:    mov    (%rdi),%rdx
   0x000000000000001b <+27>:    test   %rdx,%rdx
   0x000000000000001e <+30>:    jns    0x7 <down_read_trylock+7>
   0x0000000000000020 <+32>:    xor    %eax,%eax
   0x0000000000000022 <+34>:    retq
   0x0000000000000023 <+35>:    mov    %gs:0x0,%rax
   0x000000000000002c <+44>:    or     $0x3,%rax
   0x0000000000000030 <+48>:    mov    %rax,0x20(%rdi)
   0x0000000000000034 <+52>:    mov    $0x1,%eax
   0x0000000000000039 <+57>:    retq

After patch, down_read_trylock:

   0x0000000000000000 <+0>:     callq  0x5 <down_read_trylock+5>
   0x0000000000000005 <+5>:     xor    %eax,%eax
   0x0000000000000007 <+7>:     lea    0x1(%rax),%rdx
   0x000000000000000b <+11>:    lock cmpxchg %rdx,(%rdi)
   0x0000000000000010 <+16>:    jne    0x29 <down_read_trylock+41>
   0x0000000000000012 <+18>:    mov    %gs:0x0,%rax
   0x000000000000001b <+27>:    or     $0x3,%rax
   0x000000000000001f <+31>:    mov    %rax,0x20(%rdi)
   0x0000000000000023 <+35>:    mov    $0x1,%eax
   0x0000000000000028 <+40>:    retq
   0x0000000000000029 <+41>:    test   %rax,%rax
   0x000000000000002c <+44>:    jns    0x7 <down_read_trylock+7>
   0x000000000000002e <+46>:    xor    %eax,%eax
   0x0000000000000030 <+48>:    retq

By using a rwsem microbenchmark, the down_read_trylock() rate (with a
load of 10 to lengthen the lock critical section) on a x86-64 system
before and after the patch were:

                 Before Patch    After Patch
   # of Threads     rlock           rlock
   ------------     -----           -----
        1           14,496          14,716
        2            8,644           8,453
        4            6,799           6,983
        8            5,664           7,190

On a ARM64 system, the performance results were:

                 Before Patch    After Patch
   # of Threads     rlock           rlock
   ------------     -----           -----
        1           23,676          24,488
        2            7,697           9,502
        4            4,945           3,440
        8            2,641           1,603

For the uncontended case (1 thread), the new down_read_trylock() is a
little bit faster. For the contended cases, the new down_read_trylock()
perform pretty well in x86-64, but performance degrades at high
contention level on ARM64.

Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torva...@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <long...@redhat.com>
---
 kernel/locking/rwsem.h | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h
index 067e265..e0bcc11 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwsem.h
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwsem.h
@@ -175,14 +175,17 @@ static inline int __down_read_killable(struct 
rw_semaphore *sem)
 
 static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
 {
-       long tmp;
+       /*
+        * Optimize for the case when the rwsem is not locked at all.
+        */
+       long tmp = RWSEM_UNLOCKED_VALUE;
 
-       while ((tmp = atomic_long_read(&sem->count)) >= 0) {
-               if (tmp == atomic_long_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, tmp,
-                                  tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
+       do {
+               if (atomic_long_try_cmpxchg_acquire(&sem->count, &tmp,
+                                       tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
                        return 1;
                }
-       }
+       } while (tmp >= 0);
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.8.3.1

Reply via email to