Laurent Pinchart wrote: > On Tuesday 25 March 2008 18:02, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: >> Laurent Pinchart wrote: >> > Regarding non-volatility nothing prevents a user from using a > volatile RAM as an MTD device, but there's little point in doing so. > Would it be acceptable for the "linear-nvram" specification > not to include > volatile RAM ? ROM chips would be excluded too. Is that an issue ?
We actually use a volatile ram (SRAM) as an MTD device. We use it to store info from bootloader and system specific values between resets. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
