On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 16:23 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Not sure whether the lockdep patches or something else is causing this
> as I haven't checked w/o the patches yet, but I seem to be having some
> confusion of printk timestamps:
Tried reverting the patches ?
> [...]
> [ 176.440255] iwl4965: No space for Tx
> [...]
> [ 147.983705] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6361): Unknown cmd fd(25)
> cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/2
> [...]
> [ 173.589209] BUG kmalloc-2048: Poison overwritten
> [...]
> [ 208.385226] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6498): Unknown cmd fd(29)
> cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/6
> [...]
> [ 139.026724] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6521): Unknown cmd fd(30)
> cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe8) on /dev/pts/7
> [...]
> [ 155.982345] ioctl32(gnome-terminal:6543): Unknown cmd fd(31)
> cmd(0000530b){t:'S';sz:0} arg(0fd7bbe0) on /dev/pts/8
> [...]
> [ 218.918388] tg3: eth0: Link is down.
> [...]
>
> Yes, these entries really were printed in that order. Btw, what's with
> the unknown ioctls?
Proably ioctl's that lack a 32 bits conversion, you'll have to dig in
the pty stuff to find out which ones it is and if it can be a problem...
> Kernel version is 2.6.25-rc8-wl-04519-g6648ff7-dirty where -wl/-dirty
> refers to wireless patches and the lockdep patches and otherwise it's
> just -rc8.
>
> johannes
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
