On Thu, 1 Aug 2019 10:32:31 +0200
Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr> wrote:
> There is no need to use GFP_ATOMIC here. GFP_KERNEL should be enough.
> GFP_KERNEL is also already used for another allocation just a few lines
> below.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo.fr>
> ---
Good catch.
Reviewed-by: Greg Kurz <gr...@kaod.org>
> arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c
> b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c
> index 8ef9cf4ebb1c..b4f5eb9e0f82 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/xive/spapr.c
> @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static int xive_irq_bitmap_add(int base, int count)
> {
> struct xive_irq_bitmap *xibm;
>
> - xibm = kzalloc(sizeof(*xibm), GFP_ATOMIC);
> + xibm = kzalloc(sizeof(*xibm), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!xibm)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
