On Fri, Apr 04, 2008 at 07:39:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > Well we still have the regression against 2.6.23 and I'd like to > get that fixed in 2.6.25 if it's not already release by the time > we get there. > > Would you prefer using Nathan's proper patch for 2.6.25, or do > that for 2.6.26 instead, perhaps using Jens' patch as a quick > fix, as Nathan suggested?
Nathan's patch is not correct either because each file needs it's own open count. But something similar would be correct. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev