> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.mur...@arm.com>
> Sent: 2019年8月16日 18:26
> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>
> Cc: jingooh...@gmail.com; gustavo.pimen...@synopsys.com;
> bhelg...@google.com; robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
> shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; kis...@ti.com;
> lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com; a...@arndb.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org;
> M.h. Lian <minghuan.l...@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai...@nxp.com>;
> Roy Zang <roy.z...@nxp.com>; linux-...@vger.kernel.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; Z.q. Hou
> <zhiqiang....@nxp.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting
> capability with different PEX
>
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 03:00:00AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Andrew Murray <andrew.mur...@arm.com>
> > > Sent: 2019年8月15日 20:51
> > > To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>
> > > Cc: jingooh...@gmail.com; gustavo.pimen...@synopsys.com;
> > > bhelg...@google.com; robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
> > > shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; kis...@ti.com;
> > > lorenzo.pieral...@arm.com; a...@arndb.de;
> > > gre...@linuxfoundation.org; M.h. Lian <minghuan.l...@nxp.com>;
> > > Mingkai Hu <mingkai...@nxp.com>; Roy Zang <roy.z...@nxp.com>;
> > > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org;
> > > linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org;
> > > linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of
> > > getting capability with different PEX
> > >
> > > On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 04:37:11PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote:
> > > > The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
> > > > capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
> > > > capability, make it more flexible.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c | 28
> > > > +++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > index be61d96..9404ca0 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
> > > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
> > > >
> > > > struct ls_pcie_ep {
> > > > struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > > > + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x) dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
> > > > @@ -40,25 +41,26 @@ static const struct of_device_id
> > > ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
> > > > { },
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > -static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
> > > > - .linkup_notifier = false,
> > > > - .msi_capable = true,
> > > > - .msix_capable = false,
> > > > -};
> > > > -
> > > > static const struct pci_epc_features*
> > > > ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) {
> > > > - return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
> > > > + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > > + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > > > +
> > > > + return pcie->ls_epc;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) {
> > > > struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
> > > > + struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
> > > > enum pci_barno bar;
> > > >
> > > > for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++)
> > > > dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
> > > > +
> > > > + pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep->msi_cap ? true : false;
> > > > + pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep->msix_cap ? true : false;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8
> > > > func_no, @@
> > > > -118,6 +120,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > > > platform_device
> > > *pdev)
> > > > struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > struct dw_pcie *pci;
> > > > struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
> > > > + struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
> > > > struct resource *dbi_base;
> > > > int ret;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -129,6 +132,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > if (!pci)
> > > > return -ENOMEM;
> > > >
> > > > + ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > > + if (!ls_epc)
> > > > + return -ENOMEM;
> > > > +
> > > > dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev,
> IORESOURCE_MEM,
> > > "regs");
> > > > pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
> > > > if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
> > > > @@ -139,6 +146,13 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct
> > > platform_device *pdev)
> > > > pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
> > > > pcie->pci = pci;
> > > >
> > > > + ls_epc->linkup_notifier = false,
> > > > + ls_epc->msi_capable = true,
> > > > + ls_epc->msix_capable = true,
> > >
> > > As [msi,msix]_capable is shortly set from ls_pcie_ep_init - is there
> > > any reason to set them here (to potentially incorrect values)?
> > This is a INIT value, maybe false is better for msi_capable and
> > msix_capable, of course, we don't need to set it.
>
> ls_epc is kzalloc'd and so all zeros, so you get false for free. I think you
> can
> remove these two lines (or all three if you don't care that linkup_notifier
> isn't
> explicitly set).
Agree, This is correct, thanks a lot.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Andrew Murray
>
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Andrew Murray
> > >
> > > > + ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
> > > > +
> > > > + pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
> > > > +
> > > > platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
> > > >
> > > > ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
> > > > --
> > > > 2.9.5
> > > >
