Various notifications of type "BUG kmalloc-4096 () : Redzone
overwritten" have been observed recently in various parts of
the kernel. After some time, it has been made a relation with
the use of BTRFS filesystem.

[   22.809700] BUG kmalloc-4096 (Tainted: G        W        ): Redzone 
overwritten
[   22.809971] 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

[   22.810286] INFO: 0xbe1a5921-0xfbfc06cd. First byte 0x0 instead of 0xcc
[   22.810866] INFO: Allocated in __load_free_space_cache+0x588/0x780 [btrfs] 
age=22 cpu=0 pid=224
[   22.811193]  __slab_alloc.constprop.26+0x44/0x70
[   22.811345]  kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xf0/0x2ec
[   22.811588]  __load_free_space_cache+0x588/0x780 [btrfs]
[   22.811848]  load_free_space_cache+0xf4/0x1b0 [btrfs]
[   22.812090]  cache_block_group+0x1d0/0x3d0 [btrfs]
[   22.812321]  find_free_extent+0x680/0x12a4 [btrfs]
[   22.812549]  btrfs_reserve_extent+0xec/0x220 [btrfs]
[   22.812785]  btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x178/0x5f4 [btrfs]
[   22.813032]  __btrfs_cow_block+0x150/0x5d4 [btrfs]
[   22.813262]  btrfs_cow_block+0x194/0x298 [btrfs]
[   22.813484]  commit_cowonly_roots+0x44/0x294 [btrfs]
[   22.813718]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x63c/0xc0c [btrfs]
[   22.813973]  close_ctree+0xf8/0x2a4 [btrfs]
[   22.814107]  generic_shutdown_super+0x80/0x110
[   22.814250]  kill_anon_super+0x18/0x30
[   22.814437]  btrfs_kill_super+0x18/0x90 [btrfs]
[   22.814590] INFO: Freed in proc_cgroup_show+0xc0/0x248 age=41 cpu=0 pid=83
[   22.814841]  proc_cgroup_show+0xc0/0x248
[   22.814967]  proc_single_show+0x54/0x98
[   22.815086]  seq_read+0x278/0x45c
[   22.815190]  __vfs_read+0x28/0x17c
[   22.815289]  vfs_read+0xa8/0x14c
[   22.815381]  ksys_read+0x50/0x94
[   22.815475]  ret_from_syscall+0x0/0x38

Commit 69d2480456d1 ("btrfs: use copy_page for copying pages instead
of memcpy") changed the way bitmap blocks are copied. But allthough
bitmaps have the size of a page, they were allocated with kzalloc().

Most of the time, kzalloc() allocates aligned blocks of memory, so
copy_page() can be used. But when some debug options like SLAB_DEBUG
are activated, kzalloc() may return unaligned pointer.

On powerpc, memcpy(), copy_page() and other copying functions use
'dcbz' instruction which provides an entire zeroed cacheline to avoid
memory read when the intention is to overwrite a full line. Functions
like memcpy() are writen to care about partial cachelines at the start
and end of the destination, but copy_page() assumes it gets pages. As
pages are naturally cache aligned, copy_page() doesn't care about
partial lines. This means that when copy_page() is called with a
misaligned pointer, a few leading bytes are zeroed.

To fix it, allocate bitmaps with get_zeroed_page() instead of kzalloc()

Reported-by: Erhard F. <erhar...@mailbox.org>
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204371
Fixes: 69d2480456d1 ("btrfs: use copy_page for copying pages instead of memcpy")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr>
Tested-by: Erhard F. <erhar...@mailbox.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
index 062be9dde4c6..3229a058e025 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/free-space-cache.c
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@ static int __load_free_space_cache(struct btrfs_root *root, 
struct inode *inode,
                } else {
                        ASSERT(num_bitmaps);
                        num_bitmaps--;
-                       e->bitmap = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOFS);
+                       e->bitmap = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_NOFS);
                        if (!e->bitmap) {
                                kmem_cache_free(
                                        btrfs_free_space_cachep, e);
@@ -1881,7 +1881,7 @@ static void free_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl *ctl,
                        struct btrfs_free_space *bitmap_info)
 {
        unlink_free_space(ctl, bitmap_info);
-       kfree(bitmap_info->bitmap);
+       free_page((unsigned long)bitmap_info->bitmap);
        kmem_cache_free(btrfs_free_space_cachep, bitmap_info);
        ctl->total_bitmaps--;
        ctl->op->recalc_thresholds(ctl);
@@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ static int insert_into_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl 
*ctl,
                }
 
                /* allocate the bitmap */
-               info->bitmap = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOFS);
+               info->bitmap = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_NOFS);
                spin_lock(&ctl->tree_lock);
                if (!info->bitmap) {
                        ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -2146,7 +2146,7 @@ static int insert_into_bitmap(struct btrfs_free_space_ctl 
*ctl,
 
 out:
        if (info) {
-               kfree(info->bitmap);
+               free_page((unsigned long)info->bitmap);
                kmem_cache_free(btrfs_free_space_cachep, info);
        }
 
@@ -2802,7 +2802,7 @@ u64 btrfs_alloc_from_cluster(struct 
btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group,
        if (entry->bytes == 0) {
                ctl->free_extents--;
                if (entry->bitmap) {
-                       kfree(entry->bitmap);
+                       free_page((unsigned long)entry->bitmap);
                        ctl->total_bitmaps--;
                        ctl->op->recalc_thresholds(ctl);
                }
@@ -3606,7 +3606,7 @@ int test_add_free_space_entry(struct 
btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
        }
 
        if (!map) {
-               map = kzalloc(PAGE_SIZE, GFP_NOFS);
+               map = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_NOFS);
                if (!map) {
                        kmem_cache_free(btrfs_free_space_cachep, info);
                        return -ENOMEM;
@@ -3635,7 +3635,7 @@ int test_add_free_space_entry(struct 
btrfs_block_group_cache *cache,
 
        if (info)
                kmem_cache_free(btrfs_free_space_cachep, info);
-       kfree(map);
+       free_page((unsigned long)map);
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to