On 11/18/19 1:46 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Thu 14-11-19 21:53:18, John Hubbard wrote:
>> There are four locations in gup.c that have a fair amount of code
>> duplication. This means that changing one requires making the same
>> changes in four places, not to mention reading the same code four
>> times, and wondering if there are subtle differences.
>>
>> Factor out the common code into static functions, thus reducing the
>> overall line count and the code's complexity.
>>
>> Also, take the opportunity to slightly improve the efficiency of the
>> error cases, by doing a mass subtraction of the refcount, surrounded
>> by get_page()/put_page().
>>
>> Also, further simplify (slightly), by waiting until the the successful
>> end of each routine, to increment *nr.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Jérôme Glisse <jgli...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Jan Kara <j...@suse.cz>
>> Cc: Ira Weiny <ira.we...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
>> Cc: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: John Hubbard <jhubb...@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/gup.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 40 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/mm/gup.c b/mm/gup.c
>> index 85caf76b3012..858541ea30ce 100644
>> --- a/mm/gup.c
>> +++ b/mm/gup.c
>> @@ -1969,6 +1969,29 @@ static int __gup_device_huge_pud(pud_t pud, pud_t 
>> *pudp, unsigned long addr,
>>  }
>>  #endif
>>  
>> +static int __record_subpages(struct page *page, unsigned long addr,
>> +                         unsigned long end, struct page **pages)
>> +{
>> +    int nr = 0;
>> +    int nr_recorded_pages = 0;
>> +
>> +    do {
>> +            pages[nr] = page;
>> +            nr++;
>> +            page++;
>> +            nr_recorded_pages++;
>> +    } while (addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
>> +    return nr_recorded_pages;
> 
> nr == nr_recorded_pages so no need for both... BTW, structuring this as a
> for loop would be probably more logical and shorter now:
> 
>       for (nr = 0; addr != end; addr += PAGE_SIZE)
>               pages[nr++] = page++;
>       return nr;
> 

Nice touch, I've applied it.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA



> The rest of the patch looks good to me.
> 
>                                                               Honza
> 

Reply via email to