On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 04:43:17PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> Mike Rapoport <r...@kernel.org> writes:
> > From: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com>
> >
> > Some powerpc platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below 4G. If a
> > system has more physical memory than this limit, the swiotlb buffer is not
> > addressable because it is allocated from memblock using top-down mode.
> >
> > Force memblock to bottom-up mode before calling swiotlb_init() to ensure
> > that the swiotlb buffer is DMA-able.
> >
> > Link: 
> > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/f1ebb706-73df-430e-9020-c214ec8ed...@xenosoft.de
> 
> This wasn't bisected, but I thought it was a regression. Do we know what
> commit caused it?
> 
> Was it 25078dc1f74b ("powerpc: use mm zones more sensibly") ?

swiotlb buffer is initialized before zones are actually used, so probably
not :)
 
> Or was that a red herring?
> 
> cheers
> 
> > Reported-by: Christian Zigotzky <chzigot...@xenosoft.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> > Cc: Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de>
> > Cc: Darren Stevens <dar...@stevens-zone.net>
> > Cc: mad skateman <madskate...@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
> > Cc: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulie...@suse.de>
> > Cc: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
> > Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.mur...@arm.com>
> > Cc: Rob Herring <robh...@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c | 8 ++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> > index be941d382c8d..14c2c53e3f9e 100644
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/mem.c
> > @@ -260,6 +260,14 @@ void __init mem_init(void)
> >     BUILD_BUG_ON(MMU_PAGE_COUNT > 16);
> >  
> >  #ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
> > +   /*
> > +    * Some platforms (e.g. 85xx) limit DMA-able memory way below
> > +    * 4G. We force memblock to bottom-up mode to ensure that the
> > +    * memory allocated in swiotlb_init() is DMA-able.
> > +    * As it's the last memblock allocation, no need to reset it
> > +    * back to to-down.
> > +    */
> > +   memblock_set_bottom_up(true);
> >     swiotlb_init(0);
> >  #endif
> >  
> > -- 
> > 2.24.0

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

Reply via email to