"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com> writes:
> From: Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>
>
> Towards a more consistent naming scheme.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <pet...@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com>
...
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> index 18e9fb6fcf1b..c703eb6b7461 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ config SPARC64
> select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
> select HAVE_KRETPROBES
> select HAVE_KPROBES
> - select HAVE_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
> + select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
> select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
> select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
> select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
This resulted in build failure reported by kbuild test robot. Can we
fold the below change
diff --git a/arch/sparc/Kconfig b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
index c703eb6b7461..02907584be2d 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/sparc/Kconfig
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ config SPARC64
select HAVE_FUNCTION_GRAPH_TRACER
select HAVE_KRETPROBES
select HAVE_KPROBES
- select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE
+ select MMU_GATHER_RCU_TABLE_FREE if SMP
select HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
select HAVE_ARCH_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE
select HAVE_DYNAMIC_FTRACE
We should handle that drop of SMP in a separate patch if needed.
-aneesh
