Hi,

Le 14/02/2020 à 14:54, Masami Hiramatsu a écrit :
Hi,

On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 12:47:49 +0000 (UTC)
Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr> wrote:

When a program check exception happens while MMU translation is
disabled, following Oops happens in kprobe_handler() in the following
test:

                } else if (*addr != BREAKPOINT_INSTRUCTION) {

Thanks for the report and patch. I'm not so sure about powerpc implementation
but at where the MMU translation is disabled, can the handler work correctly?
(And where did you put the probe on?)

Your fix may fix this Oops, but if the handler needs special care, it is an
option to blacklist such place (if possible).

I guess that's another story. Here we are not talking about a place where kprobe has been illegitimately activated, but a place where there is a valid trap, which generated a valid 'program check exception'. And kprobe was off at that time.

As any 'program check exception' due to a trap (ie a BUG_ON, a WARN_ON, a debugger breakpoint, a perf breakpoint, etc...) calls kprobe_handler(), kprobe_handler() must be prepared to handle the case where the MMU translation is disabled, even if probes are not supposed to be set for functions running with MMU translation disabled.

Christophe


Anyway, Naveen, can you review it?

Thank you,


[   33.098554] BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0x0000e268
[   33.105091] Faulting instruction address: 0xc000ec34
[   33.110010] Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
[   33.115348] BE PAGE_SIZE=16K PREEMPT CMPC885
[   33.119540] Modules linked in:
[   33.122591] CPU: 0 PID: 429 Comm: cat Not tainted 
5.6.0-rc1-s3k-dev-00824-g84195dc6c58a #3267
[   33.131005] NIP:  c000ec34 LR: c000ecd8 CTR: c019cab8
[   33.136002] REGS: ca4d3b58 TRAP: 0300   Not tainted  
(5.6.0-rc1-s3k-dev-00824-g84195dc6c58a)
[   33.144324] MSR:  00001032 <ME,IR,DR,RI>  CR: 2a4d3c52  XER: 00000000
[   33.150699] DAR: 0000e268 DSISR: c0000000
[   33.150699] GPR00: c000b09c ca4d3c10 c66d0620 00000000 ca4d3c60 00000000 
00009032 00000000
[   33.150699] GPR08: 00020000 00000000 c087de44 c000afe0 c66d0ad0 100d3dd6 
fffffff3 00000000
[   33.150699] GPR16: 00000000 00000041 00000000 ca4d3d70 00000000 00000000 
0000416d 00000000
[   33.150699] GPR24: 00000004 c53b6128 00000000 0000e268 00000000 c07c0000 
c07bb6fc ca4d3c60
[   33.188015] NIP [c000ec34] kprobe_handler+0x128/0x290
[   33.192989] LR [c000ecd8] kprobe_handler+0x1cc/0x290
[   33.197854] Call Trace:
[   33.200340] [ca4d3c30] [c000b09c] program_check_exception+0xbc/0x6fc
[   33.206590] [ca4d3c50] [c000e43c] ret_from_except_full+0x0/0x4
[   33.212392] --- interrupt: 700 at 0xe268
[   33.270401] Instruction dump:
[   33.273335] 913e0008 81220000 38600001 3929ffff 91220000 80010024 bb410008 
7c0803a6
[   33.280992] 38210020 4e800020 38600000 4e800020 <813b0000> 6d2a7fe0 2f8a0008 
419e0154
[   33.288841] ---[ end trace 5b9152d4cdadd06d ]---

Check MSR and convert regs->nip to virtual address if the trap
happened with MSR_IR cleared.

Reported-by: Larry Finger <larry.fin...@lwfinger.net>
Fixes: 6cc89bad60a6 ("powerpc/kprobes: Invoke handlers directly")
Cc: sta...@kernel.vger.org
Cc: Naveen N. Rao <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr>

---
The bug might have existed even before that commit from Naveen.

Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr>
---
  arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c | 4 ++++
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
index 2d27ec4feee4..f8b848aa65bd 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/kprobes.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
  #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
  #include <asm/sstep.h>
  #include <asm/sections.h>
+#include <asm/io.h>
  #include <linux/uaccess.h>
DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct kprobe *, current_kprobe) = NULL;
@@ -264,6 +265,9 @@ int kprobe_handler(struct pt_regs *regs)
        if (user_mode(regs))
                return 0;
+ if (!(regs->msr & MSR_IR))
+               addr = phys_to_virt(regs->nip);
+
        /*
         * We don't want to be preempted for the entire
         * duration of kprobe processing
--
2.25.0



Reply via email to