On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:15:09PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > I don't think you are changing the behavior here, but I still wonder if it > is in fact correct for x32: is in_x32_syscall() true here when dumping an > x32 compat elf process, or should this rather be set according to which > binfmt_elf copy is being used?
The infrastructure cold enable that, although it would require more arch hooks I think. I'd rather keep it out of this series and to an interested party. Then again x32 doesn't seem to have a whole lot of interested parties..
