Le 24/04/2020 à 04:45, Wang Wenhu a écrit :
New module which registers its memory allocation and free APIs to the
sram_dynamic module, which would create a device of struct sram_device
type to act as an interface for user level applications to access the
backend hardware device, fsl_85xx_cache_sram, which is drived by the
FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM module.
Signed-off-by: Wang Wenhu <wenhu.w...@vivo.com>
Cc: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr>
Cc: Scott Wood <o...@buserror.net>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
---
.../powerpc/include/asm/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.h | 4 ++
arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig | 10 +++++
arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile | 1 +
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h | 6 +++
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c | 12 ++++++
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_sram_uapi.c | 39 +++++++++++++++++++
6 files changed, 72 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_sram_uapi.c
We shouldn't add more stuff in arch/powerpc/sysdev/
Either it is dedicated to 85xx, and it should go into
arch/powerpc/platform/85xx/ , or it is common to several
platforms/architectures and should be moved to drivers/soc/fsl/
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.h
b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.h
index 0235a0447baa..99cb7e202c38 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.h
@@ -26,6 +26,10 @@ struct mpc85xx_cache_sram {
unsigned int size;
rh_info_t *rh;
spinlock_t lock;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_85XX_SRAM_UAPI
+ struct device *dev;
+#endif
};
extern void mpc85xx_cache_sram_free(void *ptr);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
index fa3d29dcb57e..3a6f6af973eb 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/Kconfig
@@ -16,6 +16,16 @@ if FSL_SOC_BOOKE
if PPC32
+config FSL_85XX_SRAM_UAPI
+ tristate "Freescale MPC85xx SRAM UAPI Support"
+ depends on FSL_SOC_BOOKE && SRAM_DYNAMIC
Is SRAM_DYNAMIC usefull on its own, without a driver like this one ? Is
that worth allowing tiny selection of both drivers ? Shouldn't one of
them imply the other one ?
+ select FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM
+ help
+ This registers a device of struct sram_device type which would act as
+ an interface for user level applications to access the Freescale 85xx
+ Cache-SRAM memory dynamically, meaning allocate on demand dynamically
+ while they are running.
+
config FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM
bool
select PPC_LIB_RHEAP
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile
index cb5a5bd2cef5..e71f82f0d2c3 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/Makefile
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_CORENET_RCPM) += fsl_rcpm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_LBC) += fsl_lbc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_GTM) += fsl_gtm.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_85XX_CACHE_SRAM) += fsl_85xx_l2ctlr.o
fsl_85xx_cache_sram.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_85XX_SRAM_UAPI) += fsl_85xx_sram_uapi.o
obj-$(CONFIG_FSL_RIO) += fsl_rio.o fsl_rmu.o
obj-$(CONFIG_TSI108_BRIDGE) += tsi108_pci.o tsi108_dev.o
obj-$(CONFIG_RTC_DRV_CMOS) += rtc_cmos_setup.o
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
index ce370749add9..4930784d9852 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h
@@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
#ifndef __FSL_85XX_CACHE_CTLR_H__
#define __FSL_85XX_CACHE_CTLR_H__
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+
#define L2CR_L2FI 0x40000000 /* L2 flash invalidate */
#define L2CR_L2IO 0x00200000 /* L2 instruction only */
#define L2CR_SRAM_ZERO 0x00000000 /* L2SRAM zero size */
@@ -81,6 +83,10 @@ struct sram_parameters {
phys_addr_t sram_offset;
};
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_85XX_SRAM_UAPI
+extern struct mpc85xx_cache_sram *mpc85xx_get_cache_sram(void);
'extern' keywork is meaningless here, remove it.
+#endif
+
extern int instantiate_cache_sram(struct platform_device *dev,
struct sram_parameters sram_params);
extern void remove_cache_sram(struct platform_device *dev);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
index 3de5ac8382c0..0156ea63a3a2 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.c
@@ -23,6 +23,14 @@
struct mpc85xx_cache_sram *cache_sram;
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_85XX_SRAM_UAPI
+struct mpc85xx_cache_sram *mpc85xx_get_cache_sram(void)
+{
+ return cache_sram;
+}
+#endif
This function is not worth the mess of an #ifdef in a .c file.
cache_sram is already globaly visible, so this function should go in
fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h as a 'static inline'
+
void *mpc85xx_cache_sram_alloc(unsigned int size,
phys_addr_t *phys, unsigned int align)
{
@@ -115,6 +123,10 @@ int instantiate_cache_sram(struct platform_device *dev,
rh_attach_region(cache_sram->rh, 0, cache_sram->size);
spin_lock_init(&cache_sram->lock);
+#ifdef CONFIG_FSL_85XX_SRAM_UAPI
+ cache_sram->dev = &dev->dev;
+#endif
Can we avoid the #ifdef in .c file ? (see
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/coding-style.html#conditional-compilation)
+
dev_info(&dev->dev, "[base:0x%llx, size:0x%x] configured and loaded\n",
(unsigned long long)cache_sram->base_phys, cache_sram->size);
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_sram_uapi.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_sram_uapi.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..60190bf3c8e9
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_85xx_sram_uapi.c
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Vivo Communication Technology Co. Ltd.
+ * Copyright (C) 2020 Wang Wenhu <wenhu.w...@vivo.com>
+ * All rights reserved.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/sram_dynamic.h>
+#include <asm/fsl_85xx_cache_sram.h>
+#include "fsl_85xx_cache_ctlr.h"
+
+static struct sram_api mpc85xx_sram_api = {
+ .name = "mpc85xx_sram",
+ .alloc = mpc85xx_cache_sram_alloc,
+ .free = mpc85xx_cache_sram_free,
+};
+
+static int __init mpc85xx_sram_uapi_init(void)
+{
+ struct mpc85xx_cache_sram *sram = mpc85xx_get_cache_sram();
+
+ if (!sram)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ return sram_register_device(sram->dev, &mpc85xx_sram_api);
+}
+subsys_initcall(mpc85xx_sram_uapi_init);
+
+static void __exit mpc85xx_sram_uapi_exit(void)
+{
+ sram_unregister_device(&mpc85xx_sram_api);
+}
+module_exit(mpc85xx_sram_uapi_exit);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Wang Wenhu <wenhu.w...@vivo.com>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MPC85xx SRAM User-Space API Support");
+MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
Christophe
