Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu> writes: > Le 09/07/2020 à 09:56, Santosh Sivaraj a écrit : >> Subscribe to the MCE notification and add the physical address which >> generated a memory error to nvdimm bad range. >> >> Reviewed-by: Mahesh Salgaonkar <mah...@linux.ibm.com> >> Signed-off-by: Santosh Sivaraj <sant...@fossix.org> >> --- >> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 97 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c >> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c >> index 9c569078a09fd..5ebb1c797795d 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/papr_scm.c >> @@ -13,9 +13,11 @@ >> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >> #include <linux/delay.h> >> #include <linux/seq_buf.h> >> +#include <linux/nd.h> >> >> #include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h> >> #include <asm/papr_pdsm.h> >> +#include <asm/mce.h> >> >> #define BIND_ANY_ADDR (~0ul) >> >> @@ -80,6 +82,7 @@ struct papr_scm_priv { >> struct resource res; >> struct nd_region *region; >> struct nd_interleave_set nd_set; >> + struct list_head region_list; >> >> /* Protect dimm health data from concurrent read/writes */ >> struct mutex health_mutex; >> @@ -91,6 +94,9 @@ struct papr_scm_priv { >> u64 health_bitmap; >> }; >> >> +LIST_HEAD(papr_nd_regions); >> +DEFINE_MUTEX(papr_ndr_lock); >> + >> static int drc_pmem_bind(struct papr_scm_priv *p) >> { >> unsigned long ret[PLPAR_HCALL_BUFSIZE]; >> @@ -759,6 +765,10 @@ static int papr_scm_nvdimm_init(struct papr_scm_priv *p) >> dev_info(dev, "Region registered with target node %d and online >> node %d", >> target_nid, online_nid); >> >> + mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock); >> + list_add_tail(&p->region_list, &papr_nd_regions); >> + mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock); >> + >> return 0; >> >> err: nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus); >> @@ -766,6 +776,70 @@ err: nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus); >> return -ENXIO; >> } >> >> +static void papr_scm_add_badblock(struct nd_region *region, >> + struct nvdimm_bus *bus, u64 phys_addr) >> +{ >> + u64 aligned_addr = ALIGN_DOWN(phys_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES); >> + >> + if (nvdimm_bus_add_badrange(bus, aligned_addr, L1_CACHE_BYTES)) { >> + pr_err("Bad block registration for 0x%llx failed\n", phys_addr); >> + return; >> + } >> + >> + pr_debug("Add memory range (0x%llx - 0x%llx) as bad range\n", >> + aligned_addr, aligned_addr + L1_CACHE_BYTES); >> + >> + nvdimm_region_notify(region, NVDIMM_REVALIDATE_POISON); >> +} >> + >> +static int handle_mce_ue(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long val, >> + void *data) >> +{ >> + struct machine_check_event *evt = data; >> + struct papr_scm_priv *p; >> + u64 phys_addr; >> + bool found = false; >> + >> + if (evt->error_type != MCE_ERROR_TYPE_UE) >> + return NOTIFY_DONE; >> + >> + if (list_empty(&papr_nd_regions)) >> + return NOTIFY_DONE; >> + >> + /* >> + * The physical address obtained here is PAGE_SIZE aligned, so get the >> + * exact address from the effective address >> + */ >> + phys_addr = evt->u.ue_error.physical_address + >> + (evt->u.ue_error.effective_address & ~PAGE_MASK); > > Not properly aligned
Will fix it. > >> + >> + if (!evt->u.ue_error.physical_address_provided || >> + !is_zone_device_page(pfn_to_page(phys_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT))) >> + return NOTIFY_DONE; >> + >> + /* mce notifier is called from a process context, so mutex is safe */ >> + mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock); >> + list_for_each_entry(p, &papr_nd_regions, region_list) { >> + struct resource res = p->res; > > Is this local struct really worth it ? Why not use p->res below directly ? > Right, not really needed. I can fix that in v2. >> + >> + if (phys_addr >= res.start && phys_addr <= res.end) { >> + found = true; >> + break; >> + } >> + } >> + >> + if (found) >> + papr_scm_add_badblock(p->region, p->bus, phys_addr); >> + >> + mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock); >> + >> + return found ? NOTIFY_OK : NOTIFY_DONE; >> +} >> + >> +static struct notifier_block mce_ue_nb = { >> + .notifier_call = handle_mce_ue >> +}; >> + >> static int papr_scm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >> { >> struct device_node *dn = pdev->dev.of_node; >> @@ -866,6 +940,10 @@ static int papr_scm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev) >> { >> struct papr_scm_priv *p = platform_get_drvdata(pdev); >> >> + mutex_lock(&papr_ndr_lock); >> + list_del(&(p->region_list)); >> + mutex_unlock(&papr_ndr_lock); >> + >> nvdimm_bus_unregister(p->bus); >> drc_pmem_unbind(p); >> kfree(p->bus_desc.provider_name); >> @@ -888,7 +966,25 @@ static struct platform_driver papr_scm_driver = { >> }, >> }; >> >> -module_platform_driver(papr_scm_driver); >> +static int __init papr_scm_init(void) >> +{ >> + int ret; >> + >> + ret = platform_driver_register(&papr_scm_driver); >> + if (!ret) >> + mce_register_notifier(&mce_ue_nb); >> + >> +return ret; > > Not properly aligned. will fix it. Thanks for the review! Thanks, Santosh > >> +} >> +module_init(papr_scm_init); >> + >> +static void __exit papr_scm_exit(void) >> +{ >> + mce_unregister_notifier(&mce_ue_nb); >> + platform_driver_unregister(&papr_scm_driver); >> +} >> +module_exit(papr_scm_exit); >> + >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, papr_scm_match); >> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); >> MODULE_AUTHOR("IBM Corporation"); >> > > Christophe