On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 04:57:14PM +1000, Oliver O'Halloran wrote: > Using single PE BARs to map an SR-IOV BAR is really a choice about what > strategy to use when mapping a BAR. It doesn't make much sense for this to > be a global setting since a device might have one large BAR which needs to > be mapped with single PE windows and another smaller BAR that can be mapped > with a regular segmented window. Make the segmented vs single decision a > per-BAR setting and clean up the logic that decides which mode to use. > > Signed-off-by: Oliver O'Halloran <ooh...@gmail.com> > --- > v2: Dropped unused total_vfs variables in pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources() > Dropped bar_no from pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment() > Minor re-wording of comments. > --- > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c | 131 ++++++++++----------- > arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 11 +- > 2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c > index ce8ad6851d73..76215d01405b 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c > @@ -146,21 +146,17 @@ > static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct pci_dev *pdev) > { > struct pnv_phb *phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus); > - const resource_size_t gate = phb->ioda.m64_segsize >> 2; > struct resource *res; > int i; > - resource_size_t size, total_vf_bar_sz; > + resource_size_t vf_bar_sz; > struct pnv_iov_data *iov; > - int mul, total_vfs; > + int mul; > > iov = kzalloc(sizeof(*iov), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!iov) > goto disable_iov; > pdev->dev.archdata.iov_data = iov; > - > - total_vfs = pci_sriov_get_totalvfs(pdev); > mul = phb->ioda.total_pe_num; > - total_vf_bar_sz = 0; > > for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) { > res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES]; > @@ -173,50 +169,50 @@ static void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources(struct > pci_dev *pdev) > goto disable_iov; > } > > - total_vf_bar_sz += pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, > - i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES); > + vf_bar_sz = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES); > > /* > - * If bigger than quarter of M64 segment size, just round up > - * power of two. > + * Generally, one segmented M64 BAR maps one IOV BAR. However, > + * if a VF BAR is too large we end up wasting a lot of space. > + * If each VF needs more than 1/4 of the default m64 segment > + * then each VF BAR should be mapped in single-PE mode to reduce > + * the amount of space required. This does however limit the > + * number of VFs we can support. > * > - * Generally, one M64 BAR maps one IOV BAR. To avoid conflict > - * with other devices, IOV BAR size is expanded to be > - * (total_pe * VF_BAR_size). When VF_BAR_size is half of M64 > - * segment size , the expanded size would equal to half of the > - * whole M64 space size, which will exhaust the M64 Space and > - * limit the system flexibility. This is a design decision to > - * set the boundary to quarter of the M64 segment size. > + * The 1/4 limit is arbitrary and can be tweaked. > */ > - if (total_vf_bar_sz > gate) { > - mul = roundup_pow_of_two(total_vfs); > - dev_info(&pdev->dev, > - "VF BAR Total IOV size %llx > %llx, roundup to > %d VFs\n", > - total_vf_bar_sz, gate, mul); > - iov->m64_single_mode = true; > - break; > - } > - } > + if (vf_bar_sz > (phb->ioda.m64_segsize >> 2)) { > + /* > + * On PHB3, the minimum size alignment of M64 BAR in > + * single mode is 32MB. If this VF BAR is smaller than > + * 32MB, but still too large for a segmented window > + * then we can't map it and need to disable SR-IOV for > + * this device. > + */ > + if (vf_bar_sz < SZ_32M) { > + pci_err(pdev, "VF BAR%d: %pR can't be mapped in > single PE mode\n", > + i, res); > + goto disable_iov; > + } > > - for (i = 0; i < PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS; i++) { > - res = &pdev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES]; > - if (!res->flags || res->parent) > + iov->m64_single_mode[i] = true; > continue; > + } > > - size = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES); > /* > - * On PHB3, the minimum size alignment of M64 BAR in single > - * mode is 32MB. > + * This BAR can be mapped with one segmented window, so adjust > + * te resource size to accommodate. > */ > - if (iov->m64_single_mode && (size < SZ_32M)) > - goto disable_iov; > + pci_dbg(pdev, " Fixing VF BAR%d: %pR to\n", i, res); > + res->end = res->start + vf_bar_sz * mul - 1; > + pci_dbg(pdev, " %pR\n", res); > > - dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, " Fixing VF BAR%d: %pR to\n", i, res); > - res->end = res->start + size * mul - 1; > - dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, " %pR\n", res); > - dev_info(&pdev->dev, "VF BAR%d: %pR (expanded to %d VFs for PE > alignment)", > + pci_info(pdev, "VF BAR%d: %pR (expanded to %d VFs for PE > alignment)", > i, res, mul); > + > + iov->need_shift = true; > } > + > iov->vfs_expanded = mul; > > return; > @@ -260,42 +256,40 @@ void pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov(struct pci_dev *pdev) > resource_size_t pnv_pci_iov_resource_alignment(struct pci_dev *pdev, > int resno) > { > - struct pnv_phb *phb = pci_bus_to_pnvhb(pdev->bus); > struct pnv_iov_data *iov = pnv_iov_get(pdev); > resource_size_t align; > > + /* > + * iov can be null if we have an SR-IOV device with IOV BAR that can't > + * be placed in the m64 space (i.e. The BAR is 32bit or non-prefetch). > + * In that case we don't allow VFs to be enabled since one of their > + * BARs would not be placed in the correct PE. > + */ > + if (!iov) > + return align; > + if (!iov->vfs_expanded) > + return align; > + > + align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno);
I am not sure if it has been reported yet but clang points out that align is initialized after its use: arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c:267:10: warning: variable 'align' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized] return align; ^~~~~ arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-sriov.c:258:23: note: initialize the variable 'align' to silence this warning resource_size_t align; ^ = 0 1 warning generated. > + /* > + * If we're using single mode then we can just use the native VF BAR > + * alignment. We validated that it's possible to use a single PE > + * window above when we did the fixup. > + */ > + if (iov->m64_single_mode[resno - PCI_IOV_RESOURCES]) > + return align; > + > /* > * On PowerNV platform, IOV BAR is mapped by M64 BAR to enable the > * SR-IOV. While from hardware perspective, the range mapped by M64 > * BAR should be size aligned. > * > - * When IOV BAR is mapped with M64 BAR in Single PE mode, the extra > - * powernv-specific hardware restriction is gone. But if just use the > - * VF BAR size as the alignment, PF BAR / VF BAR may be allocated with > - * in one segment of M64 #15, which introduces the PE conflict between > - * PF and VF. Based on this, the minimum alignment of an IOV BAR is > - * m64_segsize. > - * > * This function returns the total IOV BAR size if M64 BAR is in > * Shared PE mode or just VF BAR size if not. > * If the M64 BAR is in Single PE mode, return the VF BAR size or > * M64 segment size if IOV BAR size is less. > */ > - align = pci_iov_resource_size(pdev, resno); > - > - /* > - * iov can be null if we have an SR-IOV device with IOV BAR that can't > - * be placed in the m64 space (i.e. The BAR is 32bit or non-prefetch). > - * In that case we don't allow VFs to be enabled so just return the > - * default alignment. > - */ > - if (!iov) > - return align; > - if (!iov->vfs_expanded) > - return align; > - if (iov->m64_single_mode) > - return max(align, (resource_size_t)phb->ioda.m64_segsize); > - > return iov->vfs_expanded * align; > } > > @@ -450,7 +444,7 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_assign_m64(struct pci_dev *pdev, > u16 num_vfs) > continue; > > /* don't need single mode? map everything in one go! */ > - if (!iov->m64_single_mode) { > + if (!iov->m64_single_mode[i]) { > win = pnv_pci_alloc_m64_bar(phb, iov); > if (win < 0) > goto m64_failed; > @@ -543,6 +537,8 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(struct pci_dev *dev, > int offset) > res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES]; > if (!res->flags || !res->parent) > continue; > + if (iov->m64_single_mode[i]) > + continue; > > /* > * The actual IOV BAR range is determined by the start address > @@ -574,6 +570,8 @@ static int pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(struct pci_dev *dev, > int offset) > res = &dev->resource[i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES]; > if (!res->flags || !res->parent) > continue; > + if (iov->m64_single_mode[i]) > + continue; > > size = pci_iov_resource_size(dev, i + PCI_IOV_RESOURCES); > res2 = *res; > @@ -619,8 +617,8 @@ static void pnv_pci_sriov_disable(struct pci_dev *pdev) > /* Release VF PEs */ > pnv_ioda_release_vf_PE(pdev); > > - /* Un-shift the IOV BAR resources */ > - if (!iov->m64_single_mode) > + /* Un-shift the IOV BARs if we need to */ > + if (iov->need_shift) > pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, -base_pe); > > /* Release M64 windows */ > @@ -738,9 +736,8 @@ static int pnv_pci_sriov_enable(struct pci_dev *pdev, u16 > num_vfs) > * the IOV BAR according to the PE# allocated to the VFs. > * Otherwise, the PE# for the VF will conflict with others. > */ > - if (!iov->m64_single_mode) { > - ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, > - base_pe->pe_number); > + if (iov->need_shift) { > + ret = pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift(pdev, base_pe->pe_number); > if (ret) > goto shift_failed; > } > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h > b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h > index 41a6f4e938e4..902e928c7c22 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h > +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h > @@ -243,8 +243,15 @@ struct pnv_iov_data { > /* pointer to the array of VF PEs. num_vfs long*/ > struct pnv_ioda_pe *vf_pe_arr; > > - /* Did we map the VF BARs with single-PE IODA BARs? */ > - bool m64_single_mode; > + /* Did we map the VF BAR with single-PE IODA BARs? */ > + bool m64_single_mode[PCI_SRIOV_NUM_BARS]; > + > + /* > + * True if we're using any segmented windows. In that case we need > + * shift the start of the IOV resource the segment corresponding to > + * the allocated PE. > + */ > + bool need_shift; > > /* > * Bit mask used to track which m64 windows are used to map the > -- > 2.26.2 >