In commit 9b725a90a8f1 ("powerpc/64s: Disallow PROT_SAO in LPARs by default") PROT_SAO was disabled in guests/LPARs by default. So skip the test if we are running in a guest to avoid a spurious failure.
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> --- tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm/prot_sao.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm/prot_sao.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm/prot_sao.c index e0cf8ebbf8cd..30b71b1d78d5 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm/prot_sao.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/mm/prot_sao.c @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #include <sys/mman.h> +#include <unistd.h> #include <asm/cputable.h> @@ -18,9 +19,13 @@ int test_prot_sao(void) { char *p; - /* SAO was introduced in 2.06 and removed in 3.1 */ + /* + * SAO was introduced in 2.06 and removed in 3.1. It's disabled in + * guests/LPARs by default, so also skip if we are running in a guest. + */ SKIP_IF(!have_hwcap(PPC_FEATURE_ARCH_2_06) || - have_hwcap2(PPC_FEATURE2_ARCH_3_1)); + have_hwcap2(PPC_FEATURE2_ARCH_3_1) || + access("/proc/device-tree/rtas/ibm,hypertas-functions", F_OK) == 0); /* * Ensure we can ask for PROT_SAO. -- 2.25.1