> On 21-Sep-2020, at 4:55 PM, Wang Wensheng <wangwenshe...@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Build kernel with `C=2`:
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c:24:18: warning: symbol
> 'isa207_pmu_format_attr' was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c:101:5: warning: symbol 'p9_dd21_bl_ev'
> was not declared. Should it be static?
> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c:115:5: warning: symbol 'p9_dd22_bl_ev'
> was not declared. Should it be static?

Hi, 

It will be good to include a comment in the commit message saying what is the 
fix here. 
ex, declare p9_dd21_bl_ev/p9_dd22_bl_ev as static variable.

Thanks
Athira
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wang Wensheng <wangwenshe...@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c | 2 +-
> arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c    | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> index 964437adec18..85dc860b265b 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/isa207-common.c
> @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_stop,        "config:32-35");
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_start, "config:36-39");
> PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(thresh_cmp,   "config:40-49");
> 
> -struct attribute *isa207_pmu_format_attr[] = {
> +static struct attribute *isa207_pmu_format_attr[] = {
>       &format_attr_event.attr,
>       &format_attr_pmcxsel.attr,
>       &format_attr_mark.attr,
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> index 2a57e93a79dc..4a315fad1f99 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/power9-pmu.c
> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ extern u64 PERF_REG_EXTENDED_MASK;
> /* PowerISA v2.07 format attribute structure*/
> extern struct attribute_group isa207_pmu_format_group;
> 
> -int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
> +static int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
>       PM_MRK_ST_DONE_L2,
>       PM_RADIX_PWC_L1_HIT,
>       PM_FLOP_CMPL,
> @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ int p9_dd21_bl_ev[] = {
>       PM_DISP_HELD_SYNC_HOLD,
> };
> 
> -int p9_dd22_bl_ev[] = {
> +static int p9_dd22_bl_ev[] = {
>       PM_DTLB_MISS_16G,
>       PM_DERAT_MISS_2M,
>       PM_DTLB_MISS_2M,
> -- 
> 2.25.0
> 

Reply via email to