Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
On Tue, 2008-05-20 at 13:40 -0700, Trent Piepho wrote:
There was some discussion on a Freescale list if the powerpc I/O accessors
should be strictly ordered w.r.t. normal memory. Currently they are not. It
does not appear as if any other architecture's I/O accessors are strictly
ordered in this manner. memory-barriers.txt explicitly states that the I/O
space (inb, outw, etc.) are NOT strictly ordered w.r.t. normal memory
accesses and it's implied the other I/O accessors (e.g., writel) are the same.
However, it is somewhat harder to program for this model, and there are almost
certainly a number of drivers using coherent DMA which have subtle bugs because
the do not include the necessary barriers.
But clearly and change to this would be a subject for a different patch.
The current accessors should provide all the necessary ordering
guarantees...
It looks like we rely on -fno-strict-aliasing to prevent reordering
ordinary memory accesses (such as to DMA descriptors) past the I/O
access. It won't prevent reordering of memory reads around an I/O read,
though, which could be a problem if the I/O read result determines the
validity of the DMA buffer. IMHO, a memory clobber would be better.
-Scott
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
