On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 08:49:50AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> @@ -820,14 +796,25 @@ static int klp_init_object(struct klp_patch *patch, 
> struct klp_object *obj)
>       const char *name;
>  
>       obj->patched = false;
> -     obj->mod = NULL;

Why was this line removed?

>       if (klp_is_module(obj)) {
>               if (strlen(obj->name) >= MODULE_NAME_LEN)
>                       return -EINVAL;
>               name = obj->name;
>  
> -             klp_find_object_module(obj);
> +             /*
> +              * We do not want to block removal of patched modules and
> +              * therefore we do not take a reference here. The patches are
> +              * removed by klp_module_going() instead.
> +              * 
> +              * Do not mess work of klp_module_coming() and
> +              * klp_module_going().  Note that the patch might still be
> +              * needed before klp_module_going() is called.  Module functions
> +              * can be called even in the GOING state until mod->exit()
> +              * finishes.  This is especially important for patches that
> +              * modify semantic of the functions.
> +              */
> +             obj->mod = find_klp_module(obj->name);

These comments don't make sense in this context, they should be kept
with the code in find_klp_module().

-- 
Josh

Reply via email to