THREAD_ALIGN_SHIFT = THREAD_SHIFT + 1 = PAGE_SHIFT + 1
Maximum PAGE_SHIFT is 18 for 256k pages so
THREAD_ALIGN_SHIFT is 19 at the maximum.

No need to clobber cr1, it can be preserved when moving r1
into CR when we check stack overflow.

This reduces the number of instructions in Machine Check Exception
prolog and fixes a build failure reported by the kernel test robot
on v5.10 stable when building with RTAS + VMAP_STACK + KVM. That
build failure is due to too many instructions in the prolog hence
not fitting between 0x200 and 0x300. Allthough the problem doesn't
show up in mainline, it is still worth the change.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <l...@intel.com>
Fixes: 98bf2d3f4970 ("powerpc/32s: Fix RTAS machine check with VMAP stack")
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@csgroup.eu>
---
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.h        | 2 +-
 arch/powerpc/kernel/head_book3s_32.S | 6 ------
 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.h b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.h
index 961b1ce3b6bf..5d4706c14572 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_32.h
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
        lwz     r1,TASK_STACK-THREAD(r1)
        addi    r1, r1, THREAD_SIZE - INT_FRAME_SIZE
 1:
-       mtcrf   0x7f, r1
+       mtcrf   0x3f, r1
        bt      32 - THREAD_ALIGN_SHIFT, stack_overflow
 #else
        subi    r11, r1, INT_FRAME_SIZE         /* use r1 if kernel */
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_book3s_32.S 
b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_book3s_32.S
index 086970bec32c..727fdab557c9 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_book3s_32.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/head_book3s_32.S
@@ -278,12 +278,6 @@ MachineCheck:
 7:     EXCEPTION_PROLOG_2
        addi    r3,r1,STACK_FRAME_OVERHEAD
 #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_CHRP
-#ifdef CONFIG_VMAP_STACK
-       mfspr   r4, SPRN_SPRG_THREAD
-       tovirt(r4, r4)
-       lwz     r4, RTAS_SP(r4)
-       cmpwi   cr1, r4, 0
-#endif
        beq     cr1, machine_check_tramp
        twi     31, 0, 0
 #else
-- 
2.25.0

Reply via email to