On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 05:28:09PM -0300, Daniel Henrique Barboza wrote:
> We don't need the 'lmbs_available' variable to count the valid LMBs and
> to check if we have less than 'lmbs_to_remove'. We must ensure that the
> entire LMB range must be removed, so we can error out immediately if any
> LMB in the range is marked as reserved.
> 
> Add a couple of comments explaining the reasoning behind the differences
> we have in this function in contrast to what it is done in its sister
> function, dlpar_memory_remove_by_count().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb...@gmail.com>

Reviewed-by: David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

> ---
>  .../platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c        | 28 +++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c 
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> index 3c7ce5361ce3..ee88c1540fba 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -517,7 +517,6 @@ static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_index(u32 drc_index)
>  static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_ic(u32 lmbs_to_remove, u32 drc_index)
>  {
>       struct drmem_lmb *lmb, *start_lmb, *end_lmb;
> -     int lmbs_available = 0;
>       int rc;
>  
>       pr_info("Attempting to hot-remove %u LMB(s) at %x\n",
> @@ -530,18 +529,29 @@ static int dlpar_memory_remove_by_ic(u32 
> lmbs_to_remove, u32 drc_index)
>       if (rc)
>               return -EINVAL;
>  
> -     /* Validate that there are enough LMBs to satisfy the request */
> +     /*
> +      * Validate that all LMBs in range are not reserved. Note that it
> +      * is ok if they are !ASSIGNED since our goal here is to remove the
> +      * LMB range, regardless of whether some LMBs were already removed
> +      * by any other reason.
> +      *
> +      * This is a contrast to what is done in remove_by_count() where we
> +      * check for both RESERVED and !ASSIGNED (via lmb_is_removable()),
> +      * because we want to remove a fixed amount of LMBs in that function.
> +      */
>       for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
> -             if (lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_RESERVED)
> -                     break;
> -
> -             lmbs_available++;
> +             if (lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_RESERVED) {
> +                     pr_err("Memory at %llx (drc index %x) is reserved\n",
> +                             lmb->base_addr, lmb->drc_index);
> +                     return -EINVAL;
> +             }
>       }
>  
> -     if (lmbs_available < lmbs_to_remove)
> -             return -EINVAL;
> -
>       for_each_drmem_lmb_in_range(lmb, start_lmb, end_lmb) {
> +             /*
> +              * dlpar_remove_lmb() will error out if the LMB is already
> +              * !ASSIGNED, but this case is a no-op for us.
> +              */
>               if (!(lmb->flags & DRCONF_MEM_ASSIGNED))
>                       continue;
>  

-- 
David Gibson                    | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au  | minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
                                | _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to